May 26, 2020 Planning Commission

[00:00:02]

OKAY.

GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.

[CALL TO ORDER]

IT'S A SEVEN OH ONE.

AND ONCE AGAIN WE ARE DOING THIS TELEPHONICALLY.

HOPEFULLY SOON WE'LL BE ABLE TO GET BACK INTO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER.

SO WE WILL BEGIN BY RISING FOR A MOMENT OF SILENT PRAYER MEDITATION, WHICH WILL BE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED BY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, WHICH I WILL GO AHEAD AND LEAD.

SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND HAVE THE A MOMENT OF SILENCE PLEASE.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

AND UH, FOLLOW ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

PLACE YOUR HAND, RIGHT HAND OVER YOUR HEART.

READY BEGIN.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC REPUBLIC, WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

I THINK SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE BEEN ON MUTE.

OKAY.

NOW A MADAM ASSISTANT CITY CLERK.

MAY WE HAVE THE ROLL CALL PLEASE.

WAS THERE, I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO WAS THERE.

SO YES.

OH, HERE.

COMMISSIONER HALL.

COMMISSIONER JACQUETTE.

JACQUELINE.

THANK COMMISSIONER KENNEDY.

YEAH.

COMMISSIONER HALTS WILL NOT BE JOINING US.

HIS UH, HIS ABSENCE IS AN EXCUSED ABSENCE.

NEXT WE'LL HAVE APPROVAL

[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THOSE MINUTES HEARING? NONE.

THOSE MINUTES WILL BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED.

NEXT IS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS.

DO WE HAVE ANY ORAL COMMUNICATION SPEAKERS OR EMAILS OR ANYTHING? ADAM CITY CLERK? NO, WE HAVE NO SPEAKERS.

OKAY.

VERY GOOD.

THEN WE WILL DISPENSE IT ALL COMMUNICATIONS AND MOVE ON TO THE AGENDA.

WE

[2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 20-04 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION APPLICANT: Valencia Heights Water Company (Dave Michalko) LOCATION: 330 S. Citrus Street (AIN: 8480-016-031;Maverick Ridge Rider Park) REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the upgraded operation of a public utility station and yard, including the installation of a new fuel storage tank.]

THE FIRST ONE IS ITEM NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NUMBER TWO ZERO DASH ZERO FOR CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION.

THE APPLICANT IS VALENCIA HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY REPRESENTED BY DAVE MICHALKO AT THREE 30 SOUTH CITRUS STREETS, MAVERICK RIDGE, UH, MAVERICK RIDGE RIDER PARK OR RIDGE RIDER PARK OF COURSE.

AND UH, OKAY.

MAYBE WE HAVE THE STAFF REPORT.

WE'LL BE PRESENTING THAT PLEASE.

OUR UM, ASSISTANT PLANNER FAMILIA MARTINEZ IS GOING TO BE PRESENTING THE STAFF REPORT FOR THIS ITEM.

OKAY.

LET ME JUST SAY ONE THING REAL QUICK.

UH, BECAUSE OF THE SITUATION WE WERE IN ON THE PHONE AND EVERYTHING.

IF ANY COMMISSIONER OR, OR IN OUR STAFF FOR THAT MATTER, UH, SPEAKS, PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF SO EVERYONE CAN KNOW WHO'S SPEAKING AND IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND I WILL ACKNOWLEDGE YOU.

OKAY.

SO CAMILLA, GO AHEAD PLEASE.

GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS CHAMELEON MARTINEZ ASSISTANT PLANNER.

TODAY WE'LL BE PRESENTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004 FOR VALENCIA HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY.

IT IS LOCATED AT 33 SOUTH CITRUS STREET, UM, INSIDE OF MALBEC GRIDS RIDER PARK IN BETWEEN THE BASEBALL FIELD AND THE QUESTION AREA.

THE APPLICANT IS OF ATLANTA HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY.

UH, THE CURRENT ZONING IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THE EXISTING LOT AREA IS 14,146 SQUARE FEET.

SOME BACKGROUND ON THE SITE, THE WATER PUMP STATION WAS INITIALLY APPROVED IN 1996 THROUGH CUP FOUR 83 A 43 WAS THEN AMENDED IN 2001 THROUGH TO ALLOW FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE WATER.

WELL.

CURRENTLY THE APPLICANT IS NOW REQUESTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE UPGRADED OPERATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY STATION AND YARD INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW FUEL STORAGE TANK.

THIS IS THE CURRENT, WELL THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN AND GREEN

[00:05:01]

OKAY.

THE NEW TANK WILL BE SIX FEET TALL AND THE VENT PIPE WILL GO UP TO 12 FEET.

WE HAVE AN EAST AND WEST ELEVATION AND IF YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS CURRENT SCREENING ON SITE WITH THE CHANNELING FENCE ALSO SURROUNDED BY A SIX FOOT HIGH UM HEDGE THAT ALLOWS FOR SCREENING OF THE SITE AND ITS NEW EQUIPMENT.

HERE ARE THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS.

IT'S PRETTY STRAIGHT FORWARD.

UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2004 I AM HERE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS THEN THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PRESENT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY.

GREAT.

THANK YOU.

CAMELIA.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS POINT FROM THE COMMISSION HEARING? NONE.

WE WILL ASK THE APPLICANT TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS PROJECT.

MR MICHALKO.

EXCUSE ME.

GOOD AFTERNOON.

CAN YOU HEAR ME WELL? YES.

OKAY.

I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME OUT HERE DURING THIS, UH, UNPRECEDENTED TIME TO, UH, HOLD THE, HOLD THE HEARING AND LOOK AT OUR APPLICATION AND HOPEFULLY APPROVE IT.

I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING FURTHER TO ADD AS TO THE PERMIT.

UM, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

I THINK STAFF HAS DONE A THOROUGH JOB PRESENTING THE PURPOSE AND WHY WE NEED TO HAVE A STORAGE OF FUEL ONSITE.

I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

OKAY.

ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT FROM THE COMMISSION? YES, THIS IS COMMISSIONER GREG CAUCUS.

OKAY.

YEAH, GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER HAWK HAS.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

UM, DAVE, I WAS WONDERING, UM, YOU KNOW, SINCE THIS, UM, YOU KNOW, PUMP STATION WAS, UH, FIRST APPROVED THROUGH THE CP BACK IN 1996, UM, THAT, UH, WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE DONE HERE WITH THIS APPLICATION, UH, IS THERE ANYTHING, UH, TO NOTE IN TERMS OF ANY CHANGES TO HOW THE SITE IS GOING TO BE SECURED OR REPORT THE SECURITY OF THE SITE IS GOING TO BE ADDRESSED IN, IN THE, IN THE PROPOSAL? UM, I THINK THE MAIN QUESTION YOU WERE ASKING ABOUT SECURITY, UM, WE ARE ACTUALLY PLANNING ON INSTALLING CAMERAS ON SITE JUST BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT, UH, COULD HAVE SOME INTEREST TO PEOPLE.

SO, UH, SINCE NO ONE THERE AT NIGHT, UH, WE DO PLAN TO PUT SOME CAMERAS UP, UH, JUST TO MONITOR THE SITE AT NIGHT EVEN WHEN THERE'S NOT STAFF ON SITE.

UM, BUT IT IS FENCED OFF.

WE HAVE NOT EVER HAD ANY ISSUES WITH ANY TYPE OF VANDALISM OR ANYTHING IN THE AREA.

UH, AND WE'VE BEEN THERE FOR 25 PLUS YEARS.

OKAY, GREAT.

SO ADDITIONAL SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE GOING IN WITH THIS, WITH THE CAMERAS? THAT'S CORRECT.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THAT'S ALL.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER COMMISSION QUESTIONS? I DO HAVE A QUESTION.

HOW MUCH FUEL ARE THERE? MISSIONARY? HANG RIGHT.

YEAH, GO AHEAD.

SO THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY IS A THOUSAND GALLONS OF DIESEL AND A THOUSAND GALLONS OF GASOLINE.

UM, WE PROBABLY WILL NEVER HOLD A HUNDRED PERCENT FULL.

UM, THERE'S GOTTA BE ROOM FOR CYCLING AND FOR DELIVERIES.

UH, BUT THE MAXIMUM IS A THOUSAND GALLONS OF EACH IS WHAT THE TANK IS GOOD FOR.

WELL, SO THE TANK USED BOTH FUEL AND DIESEL? THAT IS CORRECT.

IT SAYS IT'S ONE UNIT, BUT IT HAS TWO SEPARATE COMPARTMENTS IN IT.

HMM.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A, YOU'RE DESCRIBING THIS AS, AS AN EMERGENCY FUEL TANK.

CAN YOU KIND OF EXPLAIN THAT A LITTLE BIT? CAUSE APPARENTLY YOU DON'T GET THIS, YOU DON'T HAVE THIS ALREADY.

SO HOW IS THIS AN EMERGENCY? WHAT IS THAT EXACTLY USED FOR? OKAY, SO IT'S NOT AN EMERGENCY TANK, IT'S JUST PART OF OUR EMERGENCY REPAIR.

UM, WHAT, WHAT WE HAVE TO ENSURE, AND THERE'S, THERE'S SEVERAL

[00:10:01]

UM, AND ALL THESE ITEMS ARE THINGS THAT CAN AFFECT THE, OUR ABILITY TO PUMP WATER.

SO WE HAVE A GENERATOR THAT WE CAN TAKE TO DIFFERENT FACILITIES, THE PUMP, UM, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE FUEL AVAILABLE.

UH, SHOULD THERE NOT BE POWER AND A GAS STATION OR SOME OTHER FACILITY TO PURCHASE FUEL.

WE NEED TO HAVE IT ON THE SITE SO THAT WE CAN FUEL OUR SERVICE TRUCKS AND FUEL GENERATORS TO MAINTAIN OPERATIONS IN AN DURING AN EMERGENCY.

NOT, YOU KNOW, AS YOU'RE ASKING IF THIS IS AN EMERGENCY THING, BUT IT'S ABOUT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS.

GOTCHA.

OKAY.

JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT.

ALL RIGHT.

WELL, THE, THE PLANNING TO BUILD, WELL, WE'D BE SEEING, I MEAN HOW LARGE ARE THEY? YOU CAN'T SEE IT OVER THE FENCE.

IT'S ONLY A FIVE OR SIX FEET TALL.

IT'S GOT A SIX FOOT FENCE AROUND THE FACILITY RIGHT NOW.

I WAS AT SEA FALL.

HOW WIDE HELP, I MEAN IT'S JUST GOING TO GO UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND? NO, THIS IS ABOVE GROUND.

HMM.

OKAY.

UM, CAN YOU GIVE ME THE DIMENSION? WHAT IS IT? I DON'T SEE THE DIMENSION.

I BELIEVE IT'S SIX FEET BY 11 FEET BY SIX FEET TALL.

I COULD BE OFF A LITTLE BIT, BUT IT'S PRETTY CLOSE TO THAT.

OKAY.

SO, SO BASICALLY IT'S, IT'S ALMOST A SIZE OF A TRAILER OR SOME SORT.

OKAY.

IT'S THE SIZE OF A TRUCK, THE SIZE OF A PICKUP TRUCK, BUT YOU'RE GOING TO PUT TWO OF THEM THERE.

NOW HERE'S ONE, THAT'S ONE.

OKAY.

BUT IT'S DIVIDED, I THINK I UNDERSTOOD THAT'S CORRECT.

IT'S GOT TWO CHAMBERS IN IT.

YEAH.

OKAY.

GOT IT.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANTS? I DON'T HEAR ANY.

SO DAVE, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

NO, THANK YOU.

DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS OR COMMUNICATION ON THIS ITEM? MADAM CITY CLERK.

OKAY.

THEN I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THERE IS NO REASON TO CALL ANYBODY FORWARD.

ANYBODY.

THERE'S OPPOSITION.

SO WE'LL JUST MOVE ON.

COMMISSIONED DISCUSSION.

WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO FIRST? UNLESS THERE'S ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

IF NOT, WE'LL HAVE COMMISSION DISCUSSION.

WE SHOULD A HOT CASE.

DO YOU WANT TO LEAD OFF ON THIS? OKAY.

WELL, I DON'T REALLY HAVE A WHOLE LOT TO SAY AND IT'S, UM, I UNDERSTAND FROM THE BUSINESS I'M IN BUSINESS SORT OF THINGS THAT ARE VERY NECESSARY TO DO.

AND AS YOU KNOW, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, WATER UTILITIES AND UTILITIES, YOU KNOW, ALL KINDS, UH, HAVE TO BUILD IN, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, BACKUP SYSTEMS AND REDUNDANCIES AND SO ON.

SO THIS IS A, UM, YOU KNOW, NECESSARY THING TO DO THAT'S GOING TO, YOU KNOW, SERVE THE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY AND, AND THE CUSTOMERS OF VALENCIA.

SO, UM, SO THIS IS, UH, YOU KNOW, ALL, UH, VERY, VERY ESSENTIAL THINGS THAT WE'RE, WE'RE GOING TO BE SUPPORTING HERE WHEN WE, WE ADOPT THIS RESOLUTION.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER KENNEDY.

ANYTHING? YEAH, SO, SO THIS IS JUST A STORAGE FIELD.

IT'S CALLED WHAT THEY HAVE IS THE UPS SYSTEM AND UNINTERRUPTED, UH, UH, IT'S A BACKUP GENERATOR IN CASE OF A, OF A MAJOR FAILURE.

AND, AND THEY GOTTA HAVE FUEL FOR THIS.

SO, UH, JUST LIKE EVERY HOTEL AND AIRPORT, THEY ALL HAVE A BACKUP GENERATOR SYSTEM AND UM, IT'S ABSOLUTELY A NECESSITY.

SO I'M ALL FOR IT AND I'M READY TO MOVE THEM.

OKAY, GREAT.

HOW ABOUT PREPARATIONS FOR THE EMERGENCY AND I'M JUST CURIOUS IN TERMS OF HOW DO WE HANDLE THE, I MEAN, IS IT, IS IT MADE OUT OF AND IS THERE ANY ATTENTION IN SOME OF LEAKAGE OF THE TANK ITSELF? I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT IS ON THE LINE OR NOT BECAUSE WE WERE, I THINK DONE.

UNLESS STAFF CAN ANSWER THAT.

I AM HERE, SO, OH, YOU'RE STILL THERE? OKAY.

MAYBE YOU CAN

[00:15:01]

DAVE.

YEAH, IT IS A DOUBLE WALL THING SO THAT THERE IS PROTECTION FOR LEAKAGE AND SHE WAS ASKING YOU WHAT IT'S MADE OUT OF.

IT'S STEEL, STEEL.

THERE YOU GO, Y'ALL.

AND IT'S TWO WALL.

OH, OKAY.

THAT'S INTERESTING.

OKAY.

SO BASICALLY WE'RE NOT ANTICIPATING THAT THOSE GOING TO BE ANY LEAKAGE AND WHEN, WHEN THERE'S AN EARTHQUAKE OR WHAT HAVE YOU.

SO THAT'S GOOD.

THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

UH, LET ME JUST SAY QUICKLY THAT, UH, VALENCIA HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY HAS BEEN, LIKE DAVE SAID, HAS BEEN A, YOU KNOW, A, A, A BUSINESS AND A NEIGHBOR IN WEST COVINA FOR 25 YEARS AND, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE, UH, GO UP AND DOWN CITRUS ALL DAY LONG AND PROBABLY DON'T EVEN KNOW IT'S BACK THERE.

SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THIS WILL, UH, UH, CHANGE THAT THIS IS JUST SOMETHING THEY NEED TO HAVE.

AND, UH, I, YOU KNOW, I'M ALL FOR IT.

SO, UH, IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, I'LL, I'LL, IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS ITEM? THIS IS COMMISSIONER HOCKEY IS I UM, MOVE, UH, APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTION.

OKAY.

OH, WE NEED RESOLUTION NUMBERS CORRECT.

OR ANY NUMBER.

THIS IS PLENTY.

THIS IS PLANNING MANAGERS, JOANNE BURNS.

THE NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER IS RESOLUTION NUMBER 20 DASH ZERO DOWNPLAYS 20 DASH SIX ZERO THREE SIX.

OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY HOC HEZ FOR APPROVAL.

I'LL GO AHEAD AND SECOND.

CAN WE HAVE A ROLL CALL PLEASE? I'M COMMISSIONER.

COMMISSIONER HANK.

HI.

THE MISSIONARY RED HOLE OR VICE CHAIR.

RED HOLE.

COMMISSIONER KENNEDY.

COMMISSIONER.

HER KIDS.

WE HAVE A VOTE OF FOUR.

I THINK FOUR ZERO AND ONE A.

WELL HE'S NOT HERE SO FOUR ZERO TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION.

OKAY.

THIS ACTION IS FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITHIN 10 DAYS.

SO CONGRATULATIONS DAVE AND UH, WE LOOK FORWARD TO UH, SEEING THAT NEW FACILITY GO UP AT YOUR PROPERTY.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT, WE CAN NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM

[3. CODE AMENDMENT NO. 20-01 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION LOCATION: City-wide REQUEST: The proposed code amendments consist of certain amendments to the Zoning section of the West Covina Municipal Code to modify motion picture filming/film permit standards. This Code Amendment was reviewed by the City Council on April 21, 2020 and was forwarded back to the Planning Commission for further revisions.]

THIS IS A REQUEST.

THIS IS A PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT CONSISTS OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING SECTION OF THE WEST COVINA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY MOTION PICTURE FILMING AND FILM PERMIT STANDARDS.

CODE AMENDMENT WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21ST, 2020 AND WAS FORWARDED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR FURTHER REVISIONS AND WHO WILL BE PRESENTING THIS STAFF REPORT.

PLEASE SHARE WRITTEN HOLDS.

I'M JOANNE.

I'M GOING TO BE PRESENTING THE, THE, THE FACT REPORT.

JOANNE, THE PLANNING MANAGER.

PLANNING MANAGER.

JOANNE BURNS, PLEASE GO AHEAD.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING.

HONORABLE CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.

THE ITEM BEFORE YOU WAS THE FIRST INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 21ST, 2020 IT WAS THEN BROUGHT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS A STUDY SESSION ITEM ON FEBRUARY 11TH, 2020 THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CODE AMENDMENT ON MARCH 10TH AND APPROVED RESOLUTION NUMBER 20 DASH SIX ZERO THREE ZERO RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE CODE AMENDMENT ON APRIL 21ST THE CITY COUNCIL HELD A PUBLIC HEARING AND AT THAT TIME THE CITY COUNCIL FORWARDED THE ITEM BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVISIONS.

ONE OF THE MAIN CONCERNS THAT THE COUNCIL HAD WAS THE ALLOTTED TIME PROVIDED FOR, FOR FILMING IN NON-RESIDENTIAL STONES THAT THEY BELIEVED WAS TOO, UM, WHICH WAS 20 TIMES WAS NOT, IT WASN'T CLEAR ON HOW MANY DAYS ARE ALLOWED AND THEY ALSO, UH, IN ADDITION TO THAT, THEY ALSO THOUGHT THAT 20 TIMES OR 20 DAYS WORTH TO EXCESSIVE AS WELL AS THE SEVEN DAY COOLING OFF PERIOD THAT WAS PRESENTED AT THE TIME.

IN

[00:20:01]

SO IT'S EASIEST TO UNDERSTAND AND FOLLOW.

THE SLIDE SHOWS THAT THE PREVIOUS DRAFT LANGUAGE FOR FILMING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES AND ALSO THE RECOMMENDED REVISION THAT IS PRESENTED PER THE CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION.

SO IN THE PREVIOUS DRAFT LANGUAGE UP THE FILMING WAS LIMITED TO FIVE DAYS INCLUDING SETUP AND DISMANTLING DURING THE PLANT.

DURING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING, THE CITY COUNCIL EXPRESS THAT THEY THOUGHT FIVE DAYS IN INCLUDING SETUP AND DISMANTLING WAS TOO LITTLE.

SO THE RECOMMENDED THE PROVISION IS FIGHT TO ALLOW FIVE DAYS NOT INCLUDING SETUP ANY SETUP AND DISMANTLING.

AND IN ADDITION TO THIS, WE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE CHANGE THE THREE MONTHS IN BETWEEN TIME PERIODS BE REVISED TO 90 DAYS IN BETWEEN TIMES EACH TIME PERIOD BECAUSE THREE MONTHS IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY SINCE EACH, UM, SOME MONTHS ARE LONGER THAN OTHERS.

THE NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE DRAFT LANGUAGE FOR FILMING AND NONRESIDENTIAL ZONES FOR BOTH THE PREVIOUS LANGUAGE DRAFT LANGUAGE AND THE RECOMMENDED REVISION.

SO I'VE, I FORGOT SOMETHING I NEGLECTED TO MENTION EARLIER THAT THE, THAT THE CHANGES MADE TO THE CURRENT LANGUAGE IN THE PREVIOUS DRAFT, UM, LANGUAGE IS COLORED IN RED AND THE CHANGES, UM, BE RECOMMENDED TO BE MADE IN THE REVISION IS I'VE HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW.

SO IN THE PREVIOUS RANK DRAFT LANGUAGE, IT WAS 25, I'M SORRY, 20 TIMES PER PRODUCTION OR FILM WITH UM, IN A CALENDAR YEAR WITH A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS IN BETWEEN EACH TIME PERIOD, UM, SINCE 20 TIMES COULD, UM, COULD BE ANY NUMBER OF DAYS.

UM, AND UH, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO TELL TO PLACE A LIMIT ON THE DAYS AND AS WELL AS 20 DAYS IN ITSELF THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FELT WAS TOO EXCESSIVE.

SO THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT FIFTH YEAR REVISED TO, TO ANYWHERE BETWEEN EIGHT TO 15 DAYS, UM, AND NOT AND HAVE THIS NOT INCLUDE ANY SETUP OR DISMANTLING AND THE CLOTH PERIOD WOULD BE WITH A MINIMUM OF, UM, UM, THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE BETWEEN ANY TIME BETWEEN 30 TO 60 DAYS IN BETWEEN EACH TIME PERIOD ON ANY ONE PROPERTY IN THE SHOPPING OR SHOPPING CENTER.

IF THIS STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT CODE AMENDMENT 20 DASH 20 I'M SORRY, 20 DASH ZERO ONE, UM, WITH DIRECTION ON, ON EACH, UM, BLANK SECTION IN THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.

IF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR, OR CONCERNS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

JOANNE.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF DEALT WITH THIS? THIS IS THE NEW VERSION OF IT.

IT'S BEEN TO THE COUNCIL AND NOW IT'S BACK TO US.

SO ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF HEARING NONE.

DO WE HAVE ANY, UH, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT WISH TO BE HEARD ON THIS? GOOD EVENING CHAIR.

WE HAVE NO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC.

OKAY.

OKAY.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

THEN I WILL GO AHEAD AND, UH, CLOSE THE PUBLIC TESTIMONY PORTION OF THE HEARING AND TELL US AGAIN EXACTLY WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR FROM US.

JOANNE ON THIS, SORRY, I WAS ON MUTE.

WELL, THIS IS JOANNE BURNS.

WE'LL START OFF WITH, WITH UM, SECTION 26 DASH TWO EIGHT ZERO TWO EIGHT ONE SUBSECTION ONE FOR FILMING AND RESIDENTIAL ZONE.

SO WE'VE CHANGED IT FROM, FROM FIVE DAYS, INCLUDING SETUP AND DISMANTLING TO FIVE DAYS, NOT INCLUDING SETUP IN DISMANTLING.

AND WE'VE ALSO CHANGED THE THREE MONTHS OF 90 DAYS IN BETWEEN EACH TIME PERIOD.

UH, IT, IS THE COMMISSION

[00:25:01]

WITH THIS PARTICULAR CHANGE OR IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE COMMISSION THAT HAS THAT HAS ANY OTHER, UM, RECOMMENDATIONS AS A DISCUSSION POINT? WELL, IF ANYONE HAVE ANY COMMENT ON THIS, I'LL JUST SAY THAT I'M, UH, YOU KNOW, I'M FINE WITH THIS.

I THINK IT'S A GOOD, UH, A GOOD COMPROMISE AND JUST, UH, I'M VERY HAPPY TO SEE THAT.

UH, WE HAVE GOTTEN AWAY FROM THE TIMES QUANTIFICATION CAUSE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT DAYS AND TIMES PREVIOUSLY AND I COULD SEE THAT WAS VERY CONFUSING.

I DON'T KNOW WHY WE NEEDED TO HAVE DAYS AND TIMES, SO THIS WAY WHERE WE'RE JUST NARROWING IT DOWN TO TIME, TWO DAYS ONLY AND IT'S A LOT EASIER TO FOLLOW AND UNDERSTAND.

AND I LIKED THE IDEA OF, UH, NOT INCLUDING THE SETUP AND DISMANTLING IN THE, IN THE TIME ALLOTTED.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THIS? OKAY.

UM, YEAH, I AGREE WITH HERE.

UM, MR CHAIR IS, UM, THE, UM, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT MORE, UH, MORE GENEROUS IN TERMS OF TIME THAT'S GOING TO BE, UM, BE ALLOWED FOR, UH, SET UP IN DISMANTLING, WHICH IS, UM, THE GOOD THING.

IT'S LIKE, YOU KNOW, UM, YOU KNOW, LESS, LESS BURDENSOME ON IT, ON ANY, UM, YOU KNOW, FILMING COMPANY COMING IN.

UM, AND HOPEFULLY THAT'S A LITTLE BIT MORE AMENABLE WHEN THEY DO.

UM, OF COURSE THE 90 DAYS AS OPPOSED TO THREE MONTHS.

MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

UM, THE, THE DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF DIFFERENT MONTHS OF THIS IS THIS IS A GOOD, A GOOD CHANGE THAT WE SHOULD SUPPORT.

I THINK.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONER HAWK HAS ANY OTHER COMMISSION COMMENT ON THIS? HEARING? NONE.

WE CAN GO TO A NON-RESIDENTIAL.

OKAY.

FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL.

UM, STAFF RESURRECT IS RECOMMENDING UP TO, UM, AND IN A NUMBER IN BETWEEN EIGHT TO, UM, IN 15.

SO THE PLANNING IS, DOES THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAVE ANY PREFERENCE ON THE NUMBER? ANYBODY WANT TO ADD? TIME'S STILL MEAN DAYS ARE ALLOWED.

OKAY.

SO WE NEED TO, UH, WE NEED TO PICK OUT A NUMBER BETWEEN EIGHT AND 15.

UM, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE BETWEEN EIGHT AND 15.

IT'S JUST THAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING SOME, SOME, A NUMBER BETWEEN EIGHT AND 15.

AND THAT'S MAINLY BECAUSE THE, THE RE ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THIS ITEM WAS, WAS INITIATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IS BECAUSE THE FIVE DAYS THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY IS, WAS TOO LITTLE.

SO IT HAS TO BE A NUMBER HIGHER THAN FIVE.

UM, AND THEY THOUGHT STEP IN AT THE SAME TIME.

THE CITY COUNCIL THOUGHT THAT 20 DAYS WAS TOO MUCH, SO IT HAS TO BE A NUMBER LOWER THAN 20.

OKAY.

COMMISSIONERS, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THIS QUICK CAR KISS HERE? OKAY.

MICHELLE? I GUESS, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, I GUESS, UM, I'M UNFORTUNATELY NOT, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, PRIVY TO THE, TO THE DISCUSSIONS AS TO COUNSELOR HAT ON, ON THE SIDE OF THEM.

I WISH IT WAS A LITTLE BIT MORE UP TO SPEED ON THAT AND UM, AND UH, YOU KNOW, W YOU KNOW, IN ORDER TO GET THIS THING DONE, YOU KNOW, SORT OF, YOU KNOW, PUT IT TO REST BUT YOU KNOW, MAKE, UH, MAKE SOME SOUND DECISIONS OF WHAT'S GONNA WORK, UH, FOR COMPANIES GOING TO COME IN TO FILM.

UM, IF, UH, MY THOUGHT IS, IS TO, UH, YOU KNOW, MAXIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT THEY HAVE TO OPERATE AND YOU KNOW, WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT STAFF HAVE HAS, UM, THAT FILMING DATES, YOU KNOW, UP TO 15 UP TO 15 DAYS, UM, IS FINE.

I THINK, UM, I W I WANTED, MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO GIVE THEM AS MUCH TIME AS POSSIBLE, UM, IF WE THINK THAT THAT'S NOT GONNA, UM, AS LONG AS WE THINK THAT'S GOING TO PASS MUSTER WITH, WITH EXPEDIA COUNSEL IS, AND THEN, UH, SAME GOES WITH THE, UH, THE PERIODS IN BETWEEN, UM, YOU KNOW, UH, FILMING PERIODS AND TO MAYBE ALSO MINIMIZE THE GAP IN BETWEEN AND THERE THEY PREFER TO GO WITH 30 DAYS IN BETWEEN EACH TIME PERIOD ON ANY ONE.

UH, IF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS THINK THAT THAT'S, I'M GOING TO BE TOO GENEROUS, UH, FOR FILMING COMPANIES TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE USE OF, UM, YOU KNOW, THE TIME, SPACE AND NONRESIDENTIAL AREAS AND WITH HEAR WHY,

[00:30:02]

NOW IF WE, IF WE, YOU KNOW, GO TO 15, I MEAN, THEY COULD, IF THEY CAN DO IT IN 10, I MEAN, THEY DON'T NEED TO GO TO 15 I WOULD, I WOULD ASSUME IF THEY JUST NEED 10, THEY'LL USE 10 WOULD THAT BE CORRECT? YEAH.

BUT IT'S, IT'S UP TO YOU AS A COMMUNITY.

SO IT'S UP TO, SO UP TO TODAY.

RIGHT.

SO YOU WANT TO GIVE THEM THE A UP TO 15 DAYS AND 30 DAYS, UH, IN BETWEEN EACH PERIOD.

CORRECT.

OKAY.

YOU KNOW WHAT, I TEND TO AGREE WITH THAT.

I'M COMFORTABLE WITH THAT.

ANY OTHER COMMISSION COMMENTS ON THAT? RICHARD KENNEDY? I'M, I'M GOOD WITH THAT.

YOU'RE GOOD WITH THAT.

OKAY.

YEP.

ANY OTHER COMMENT ON THAT? ANY, UH, COMMISSIONER HANG, ANY COMMENT? NO, I THINK I'M GOOD WITH IT.

I MEAN, IT'S VERY EXPENSIVE TO BE FILMING.

I MEAN, SOME, I'VE HEARD THAT EVEN ONE DAY, SOMETIME IT CAN COST UP TO 10,000.

I JUST CAN'T IMAGINE THEY USE UP ALL THE 15 DAYS.

WELL, YOU KNOW WHAT, THEY, THEY BUDGET THIS.

IT'S IN THEIR BUDGET.

YOU KNOW, THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT'S GOING TO COST.

SO THEY BUDGET FOR THIS AND YOU KNOW, THAT'S WHAT THEY DO.

SO, UH, YOU KNOW, I THINK WE NEED TO DO ALL WE CAN TO ENCOURAGE FILMING IN THE CITY.

IT BRINGS IN A REVENUE TO THE CITY AND YOU KNOW, I THINK THIS ONE IS, UH, SOMETHING WE CAN LIVE WITH AND THEY CAN LIVE WITH.

SO, UH, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO OTHER COMMENT ON THAT.

UH, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND AS OUR EMOTION ON THIS OR WE, IT'S A RESOLUTION NUMBER AGAIN, RIGHT? IT IS, JUST LOOK AT HERE.

I'M SORRY, GO AHEAD.

OH, THIS IS, IS, IS THERE STILL MORE DRAFT LANGUAGE CONSIDERED HERE? WAS IT JUST THOSE TWO SECONDS? IT WAS JUST THOSE TWO SECTIONS.

THERE IS, THERE, THERE WAS ANOTHER, THERE WAS ANOTHER CHANGE IN THE CODE.

UM, HOWEVER, THAT WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FELT NEEDED TO BE CHANGED.

SO THAT THAT'S STILL THAT SAME LANGUAGE.

SO IS REMAINING.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE.

THEN WE WILL HAVE THE RESOLUTION NUMBER PLEASE FOLLOW BY A MOTION.

THIS IS PLENTY MANAGER, JOANNE BURNS.

THE NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER IS 20 DASH SIX ZERO THREE SEVEN.

IS THERE A MOTION ON THE ITEM? I'LL MAKE A MOTION.

WHAT? APPROVE.

ABSOLUTELY.

OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY KENNEDY.

OKAY.

IS THERE A SECOND LIKE AT D J THIS IS KIND OF SHACK THAT IS JUST TO BE UM, YOU KNOW, CLEAR AND SPECIFIC AS TO THE MOTION.

THE MOTION IS, UH, FOR THE LANGUAGE CHANGES THAT WE JUST, UM, YOU KNOW, SORT OF, UH, INFORMALLY AGREED UPON.

BUT WHAT THOSE CHANGES ARE, ARE, YOU KNOW, UP TO FIVE DAYS FOR SET UP IN DISMANTLING AND IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS.

UM, BUT YOU LOOK AT THE PREVIOUS SLIDE, SO YEAH, IN ST LOUIS, MISSOURI.

UH, SO, SO, UH, ESSENTIALLY WE'RE, THE MOTION IS, IT'S TO APPROVE THIS CHANGE FOR UP TO FIVE DAYS AND WITH A MINIMUM OF 90 DAYS IN BETWEEN YOUR TIME PERIOD.

THAT'S THE CHANGE THERE IS THE MINIMUM 90 DAYS TIME PERIOD.

AND THEN SECONDLY IS THE NEXT SLIDE.

THIS IS WHERE, UM, UP TO 15 DAYS AND 30 DAYS.

A MINIMUM OF 30 DAYS BETWEEN THESE TIME PERIOD.

YEAH.

IS THAT YOUR MOTION COMMISSIONER KENNEDY? YES, IT IS.

OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY KENNEDY, UH, SECONDED BY HOC.

HAS TO APPROVE THE ITEMS. UH, MAYBE WE HAVE A ROLL CALL PLEASE.

COMMISSIONER AYE.

CHAIRMAN RED HALL.

HI MR. KENNEDY.

I THINK THAT'S IT.

SO THE MOTION PASSES, UH, FOUR ZERO.

THE ITEM IS FINAL.

IS THIS ONE OF THOSE APPEALED ONES?

[00:35:02]

I THINK SO.

THE CITY COUNCIL? YEAH, EXACTLY.

NEVERMIND.

YEAH, THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

SO THIS ITEM IS DONE.

ALL RIGHT, VERY GOOD.

LET ME GET BACK TO MY AGENDA HERE, WHICH IS, THERE IT IS.

ALL RIGHT.

NOW WE HAVE A NON-HEARING

[4. FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FILING OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN]

THIS DEALS WITH FISCAL YEAR 2020 2021, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, FILING OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND WHO'S PRESENTING THAT STAFF REPORT? JOANNE, WE CAN HARDLY HEAR YOU.

I'M FINE.

THE MANAGER MARK WILL BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM.

OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU.

GO AHEAD MARK.

THANKS.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS MARK , ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, AND I AM PRESENTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVIEW AND ULTIMATE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

UM, THE STAFF REPORT OUTLINES, UM, PROJECTS IN FIVE CATEGORIES.

UM, EXCUSE ME IN EIGHT CATEGORIES.

UH, THERE ARE BUILDINGS, GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS, PARKS, WHICH INCLUDE PLAYGROUNDS AND FIELDS, REGIONAL PROJECTS, SEWER PROJECTS, STREETS AND SIDEWALK PROJECTS AS WELL AS, UH, VEHICLE REPLACEMENT.

UM, THERE'S TWO LISTS OF PROJECTS WHICH YOU HAVE IN THE STAFF REPORT, UH, IS LABELED FISCAL YEAR 2020 THROUGH 2021.

UM, THAT ACTUALLY IS A LISTING OF ALL OF THE PROJECTS FOR ALL FIVE YEARS.

UM, I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE BIT CONFUSING, BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE ATTACHMENTS TO YOUR RESOLUTION, UM, THERE IS A SEPARATE DOCUMENT WHICH BREAKS IT DOWN.

IT'S EXHIBIT A TO THE RESOLUTION.

UH, SO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS A LIST OF PROJECTS ACROSS FIVE YEARS, AGAIN, IN EACH OF THESE CATEGORIES THAT THE CITY, UH, WISHES TO UNDERTAKE BASED UPON AVAILABLE FUNDING.

UH, AND THEN IF YOU LOOK AT EXHIBIT A, THERE ARE ALSO A THOROUGH LENGTHY LIST OF UNFUNDED PROJECTS, UM, THAT, UH, THE CITY HAS IDENTIFIED A NEED FOR BUT NOT, UH, AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES.

UM, THESE ARE PRIMARILY, UH, STREET PROJECTS, UH, STREET REHABILITATION PROJECTS, PAVING PROJECTS.

UM, THERE IS A PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT PROJECT.

THE CITY DOES GET MONEY THROUGH THE COUNTY MEASURE A FUND AND WE HAVE, UH, UH, LAID OUT OR PROGRAM TO REPLACE ONE PLAYGROUND, UM, AT, UH, EACH PARK OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

UM, AND THAT, UH, IS KIND OF A HIGH LEVEL SUMMARY OF THE LIST OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.

AND IF COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS AND ANY SPECIFIC PROJECTS, I'D CERTAINLY BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THOSE.

UM, STAFF IS LOOKING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOMMEND, AGAIN, JUST THAT FIRST YEAR OF PROJECTS, UH, WHICH WOULD COVER, UH, FISCAL YEAR 20, 20 AND 2021 WHICH WOULD START, UH, JULY 1ST THROUGH JUNE 30 OF 2021.

UH, THAT CONCLUDES MY STAFF REPORT AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF ON ANY OF THESE, UH, PROJECTS? UM, MARK, I JUST, UM, SHEENA? YEAH, GO AHEAD.

I JUST SEE PORTION THAT YOU HAD MENTIONED.

UM, REGARDING THE EIGHT ITEMS THAT WE'RE ALL GOING TO TALK ABOUT, WHICH IS THE BUILDINGS, GENERAL PARKS, REGIONAL SEWER, STREETS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND VEHICLE.

NOW THESE ARE JUST WISHLIST OR IS IT BUDGETED FOR THEM ALREADY AT THE END? TOTAL IS 11 MILLION.

THE $11 MILLION, UM, FUNDING HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED FOR ALL $11 MILLION.

[00:40:01]

SO, UH, IT DOES INCLUDE, UM, BOTH FUNDED AND UNPLUGGED.

YEAH.

OKAY.

SO IT'D BE GO TO THE NEXT COLUMN FOR 20, 21.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE GENERAL SECTION, BASICALLY THERE'S NO MONEY.

THEY'RE UNFUNDED.

IS THAT CORRECT? UH, THAT IS CORRECT.

AND THE REASON FOR THAT, I CAN GO INTO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL IF YOU WOULD LIKE, UM, THE SUMMARY PAGE ON EXHIBIT A, UM, LAYS OUT DIFFERENT FUNDING SOURCES THAT THE CITY HAS.

UM, YOU CAN SEE THERE, THE FUND DESCRIPTION.

UM, I, I WON'T WALK THROUGH EACH OF THOSE, BUT I'D HAPPY TO BE, I'D HAPPY, HAPPILY TALK ABOUT ANY ONE OF THEM.

UM, SO THE FUNDING DOES VARY YEAR TO YEAR AND THAT'S WHY, UH, AS YOU'VE NOTED UNDER THE GENERAL CATEGORY FOR YEAR TWO, THERE AREN'T ANY PROJECTS IDENTIFIED BECAUSE THERE ISN'T ANY FUNDING IDENTIFIED FOR THAT, UH, CATEGORY OF PROJECT.

OKAY.

OKAY.

THAT'S ONE QUESTION.

MY OTHER QUESTION IS, OUT OF ALL THOSE ITEMS, WELL ACTUALLY MADE THE DECISION WHAT BASICALLY GETS BUILT WELL, HOW THE MONEY GETS FUNNELED THROUGH THAT WAY.

AND LIKE OBVIOUSLY THIS IS MY FIRST TIME LOOKING AT THIS LIST.

THE LIST OF ALL NEEDS, I GUESS I'LL CALL THEM, HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED THROUGH A VARIETY OF SOURCES.

UM, CITY STAFF, UH, COMMUNITY WISHES AS WELL AS ITEM FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.

AND WHAT STAFF DOES IS KIND OF RECOMMENDS BASED ON AVAILABLE FUNDING, HOW WE THINK THE PROJECT, UM, WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED YEAR BY YEAR, UH, PROCESSES STAFF PUTS TOGETHER THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEWS IT TO, UM, DETERMINE IF THE PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN.

IN OTHER WORDS, WE DON'T WANT TO DO A CAPITAL PROJECT IF IT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.

AND THEN THE ULTIMATE DECISION, I THINK WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR, THE CITY COUNCIL WOULD ADOPT THE CIP AS PART OF THE, UH, GENERAL, THERE'S TWO PORTIONS TO THE CITY'S BUDGET, GENERAL FUND PORTION, WHICH FUNDS FIRE SERVICES, POLICE SERVICES, MOST STAFF SERVICES, AND THEN THE CAPITAL PORTION.

UM, SO ALL OF THIS WOULD ULTIMATELY BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WHEN THEY DO THEIR, UH, BUDGET HEARINGS IN, UH, JUNE.

.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER? HANG, THAT'S IT FOR NOW.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

SO BASICALLY MY UNDERSTANDING OF THIS IS OUR ROLE AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS JUST TO DETERMINE THAT ALL THESE CIP PROJECTS ARE INDEED, UH, UH, PERMISSIBLE THROUGH THE GENERAL PLAN.

THAT'S, THAT'S OUR SITE.

THAT IS CORRECT, YES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? UH, YEAH, THIS IS COMMISSIONER HAQUEZ.

YES, GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER.

UM, YEAH.

AND, AND YOU KNOW, WITH REGARD TO, UH, YOU KNOW, OUR COMMISSION'S SPECIFIC ROLE HERE IN APPROVING THE CIP, UH, FROM THE STANDPOINT OF BEING, UM, CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN.

UM, YOU KNOW, I CAN, I CAN PROBABLY ASSUME, UH, WITH SOME, UM, MEASURED CONFIDENCE THAT THAT'S PROBABLY THE CASE WITH REGARD TO THIS PARTICULAR CIB THAT, THAT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL.

BUT, UM, UH, I THINK IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT, UM, WE COULD BE PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, I THINK IN FUTURE AND WHEN THE CIP IS PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION, IT JUST SORT OF, YOU KNOW, MAYBE CHECK OFF ON A TABLE THAT, UH, GIVES US SORT OF LIKE A CHECK BOX OF, YOU KNOW, UH, FOR, YOU KNOW, THE GROUP OF PROJECTS OR IN INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS OF, YOU KNOW, HOW DOES IT, YOU KNOW, HOW DOES IT, HOW DOES IT CHECK WITH CONSISTENCY

[00:45:01]

UM, YOU KNOW, SUCH AS, YOU KNOW, UM, GETTING THE, YOU KNOW, THE PROJECT FOR SECURITY FENCING AND RESTAURANT AGREEMENTS, THAT ORANGE WOOD PARK, YOU KNOW, IF THERE'S A PARTICULAR STATEMENT IN THE GENERAL PLAN THAT HAS A, UM, THAT THAT HAS, UH, UH, YOU KNOW, SOME CONFORMANCE TO WHAT THAT PROJECT'S ABOUT.

JUST CITE THE SECTION AND THE NEW COMMISSIONER HAWK IS, ARE YOU SUGGESTING PERHAPS A CROSS REFERENCE TO A SECTION OR SUBSECTION? YEAH, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

OKAY.

YEAH.

I THINK IF WE'RE, YOU KNOW, I THINK JUST LOOKING AT THE LIST AND YOU KNOW, I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW THIS HAS BEEN DONE IN THE PAST, YOU KNOW, UM, I THINK, YOU KNOW, HERE WE'RE DEALING WITH, YOU KNOW, NEW COMMISSIONERS HERE.

WE HAVE A LOT OF LOGGING YOUR STAFF.

WE HAVE A NEW CITY MANAGER MEETING, JUST THE CITY MANAGER, MR PERSICO AND, AND OUR PLANNING MANAGER.

AND UM, YOU KNOW, THINGS HAVE HAVE CHANGED AND TURNED OVER QUITE A BIT AND, BUT, UM, SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT THIS, UH, HAS TYPICALLY HOW THIS TYPICALLY HAS BEEN HANDLED IN THE PAST, BUT I KIND OF CROSS REFERENCE WITH THE NICE, UM, I THINK IT SORT OF GOES RIGHT TO THE POINT OF WHY WE'RE DOING THIS AND, AND UH, THE NICE TO HAVE THAT DONE NEXT TIME AROUND.

CERTAINLY WE CAN DO THAT, UM, FOR THE CIP WHEN IT COMES FORWARD TO THE COMMISSION NEXT YEAR.

I THINK THAT'S FAIRLY EASY FOR STAFF.

WAS TOGETHER.

YEAH.

IT'S JUST AN ADDED COLUMN IS INCLUDED.

YEAH, VERY GOOD IDEA.

I LIKE IT.

COMMISSIONER HUCK IS THAT ENGINEERING MIND OF YOURS IS ALWAYS HUMMING ISN'T IT? I PREFER, I THINK IT'S MORE RAT LIKE RABIDLY BUT WELL IT'S LOOKING FOR COMPANY SO THAT'S GOOD.

UH, ALRIGHT.

YES, WE SHOULDN'T HANG.

I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION.

IT JUST BOOK SAMPLE.

UM, THIS WOULD BE FOR THE ASSISTANT MANAGERS MARK, FOR EXAMPLE, THE HEART SOUNDS AND FEELS IT'S BASICALLY BUDGETED 880,000 FOR 2020 AND 2021 IT, THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE MEASURE AGE FUND THAT CAME IN AND THAT WE AS A CITY WHEN WE RECEIVED THAT MONEY, WE CAN NOT USE IT FOR ANYTHING ELSE FOR POS PURPOSES.

THAT IS CORRECT.

YES.

MEASURE A IS A COUNTYWIDE BOND MEASURE, UM, SPECIFICALLY DEDICATED TO PARK IMPROVEMENTS.

OKAY.

SO ALL OF THESE MONEY THAT'S LISTED OFF THE PORTAL, 11 MILLION, WE CANNOT BASICALLY SHUFFLE THIS FUND TO SOMEWHERE ELSE.

IT HAS TO BE DONE THAT, FOR EXAMPLE, THE SEWER HAS TO BE DONE DUE TO THE MEASURE THAT WE RECEIVED.

IS THAT, IS THAT HOW IT WORKS? UM, PROJECT? IT DOES.

YES.

UM, EACH CATEGORY OF PROJECT HAS DIFFERENT FUNDING SOURCES.

FOR INSTANCE, THE TWO THAT YOU, UH, ASK QUESTIONS ABOUT, YES.

PARKS ARE FUNDED THROUGH MEASURE A, WHICH IS A COUNTYWIDE, UH, MEASURE.

AND THEN THE, UM, IF YOU LOOK AGAIN ON THE SUMMARY PAGE, FUND MEMBERS ONE 70 THROUGH ONE 77, ARE ALL PARK DEDICATION FUNDS AND THAT IS PAID BY DEVELOPERS.

WHEN THEY DO SUBDIVISION MAPS, UH, THERE'S A QUEEN BEE FEE THAT THEY PAY INTO THAT.

SO THOSE FUNDS ARE DEDICATED SPECIFICALLY FOR PARKS.

THE SEWER FUND IS, UM, PAID BY PROPERTY OWNERS, UM, AS PART OF THEIR, UH, BILLS THAT THEY RECEIVE.

A PORTION OF THAT MONEY GOES INTO THE SEWER FUND FOR, UM, MAINTENANCE OF THE SEWER LINES.

UM, THERE'S ALSO GAS TAX MONEY AND PROP OR I'M SORRY, MEASURE R AND MEASURE M, UH, THE MEASURES OUR COUNTYWIDE MEASURES ARE, AND M, UH, SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS MAY RECALL WERE MEASURES THAT, UH, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY PUT ON THE COUNTYWIDE BALLOT, UM, SEVERAL YEARS AGO.

AND AGAIN, THOSE ARE DEDICATED MONIES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS.

SO OUT OF THIS 11 POINT $1 MILLION, IF YOU LOOK AT THE SUBSEQUENT PAGES, EACH PROJECT THAT'S BEEN IDENTIFIED HAS A SPECIFIC FUNDING SOURCE, UH, TIED TO IT.

[00:50:01]

I KNOW THAT'S A PRETTY LONG ANSWER TO A SIMPLE QUESTION, BUT HOPEFULLY THAT HELPS CLARIFY HOW THIS WAS PUT TOGETHER.

AND MARK, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? OH, NO, I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM IT THAT IF HE HELP ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THAT I HAD ASKED.

OH, GOOD.

THANK YOU.

DID YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE FIRE STATIONS, THE FUNDING FOR THAT OR THE HEADQUARTERS AND, UM, WELL, ON THE LIST IN THE STAFF REPORT, UM, THOSE FIRE STATION IMPROVEMENTS WERE SHOWN AS PROJECTS TO BE COMPLETED IN, UM, THE UPCOMING FISCAL YEAR.

UM, IF IT STARTS JULY 1ST, THOSE ARE ACTUALLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE DETAIL SHEETS, THOSE ARE ACTUALLY UNFUNDED PROJECTS.

UM, SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS MAY BE AWARE THAT THE COUNCIL IS LOOKING AT DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES FOR PROVIDING FIRE SERVICE IN THE CITY.

SO, UM, THE, UM, FIRE STATION PROJECTS WHICH ARE IN THE BUILDINGS LIST, UM, THOSE ARE ALL UNFUNDED PROJECTS BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW HOW FIRE SERVICES ARE GOING TO BE DELIVERED.

I THINK WE'LL HAVE A LOT MORE CLARITY ON THAT ISSUE WITHIN THE NEXT, I SAY SIX MONTHS BETWEEN NOW AND THE END OF THE CALENDAR YEAR.

AND THEN DEPENDING UPON WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE FIRE SERVICE, WE'LL LOOK AT AS PART OF NEXT YEAR CIT, IF ANY OF THOSE PROJECTS WOULD MOVE FROM THE UNFUNDED LIST OF THE FONDANT.

GOTCHA.

GO AHEAD SHEENA.

I'M SURE I HAVE A QUESTION TO BE.

GOT IT.

UNFUNDED PROJECT, YOU WERE SAYING MARK, THAT ALL THE FIRE STATION, IF YOU LOOK AT THE US, ASHBY PULLED UP 24.5 MILLION.

ALL THOSE ARE UNFUNDED CURRENTLY.

THAT IS CORRECT, YES.

AND SOME OF THOSE, SOME OF THOSE ARE, I'M NOT, I SHOULDN'T SAY THAT.

UNFUNDED LIST IS NOT EXCLUSIVE TO FIRE STATIONS.

UH, THERE ARE A NUMBER OF FIRE STATION PROJECTS ON THERE, BUT THERE'S ALSO SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO THE POLICE BUILDING.

UH, THERE WERE SOME IMPROVEMENTS TO CITY HALL.

UM, SO THE UNFUNDED LIST IS A VARIETY OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS THAT UH, NEED SOME TLC.

SO WE'VE IDENTIFIED THE NEED BUT HAVING IDENTIFIED A FUNDING.

OKAY.

RIGHT NOW GO AHEAD SHANA.

OKAY.

I JUST SAY MANAGERS.

SO CURRENTLY THIS LIST RIGHT NOW IS ONLY 4.5 MINUTES.

JUST A WISHFUL LIST ONE WAY.

THAT IS ONE WAY TO LOOK AT IT.

YES.

OKAY.

SO LIKE FOR EXAMPLE, 15 MILLION THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO GO SO FAR AS THEY SHOULD WANT HER QUARTER REPLACEMENT, THAT'S BASICALLY A WISHFUL VOTING THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IN THE FUTURE IF THERE'S FUNDING FOR THEM.

CORRECT.

GOTCHA.

OKAY.

THERE'S A NEED, THERE MAY NOT BE A NEED FOR THAT DEPENDING ON HOW THINGS GO.

I THINK THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER, YOU ARE ALSO CORRECT CHAIR.

YES.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

ANYTHING ELSE ON THIS ITEM FROM ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS? I HEAR AN ANSWER.

WHAT ARE WE LOOKING FOR? WHAT ACTION DO WE NEED ON THIS? STAFF WOULD LIKE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ADOPT, UM, THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION.

UM, AND I THINK UH, JOANNE CAN, UH, TELL US WHAT THE RESOLUTION MEMBER WOULD.

OKAY.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

THIS IS FUNDING MANAGER JOANNE BURNS.

THE NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER IS 20 DASH SIX ZERO THREE EIGHT.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THIS RESOLUTION PLEASE? WELL, WE MAKE THE MOTION.

COMMISSIONER KENNEDY, CAN I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION? UM, WHEN WE ADAPTED THESE RESOLUTIONS, THESE ARE THE MONIES THAT WERE EARMARKING FOR US IN THIS AREA IN TERMS OF PROJECT, LIKE IT CAN BE ADJUSTED AND CHANGED, IS THAT CORRECT?

[00:55:03]

WELL THE COMMISSION IS MAKING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL.

THE COUNCIL MAKES THE FINAL DETERMINATION.

SO THE CITY COUNCIL YES.

COULD REAPPROPRIATE MONIES FROM ONE PROJECT TO ANOTHER PROJECT? THAT IS CORRECT.

YEAH.

JUST AS A GENERAL KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOESN'T DEAL WITH FUNDING OR MONEY AT ALL.

WE WERE JUST BASICALLY LOOKING AT THESE, YOU KNOW, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEE IT WITH, RIGHT.

AM I CORRECT? WE DON'T DEAL WITH THAT.

IS THAT IS CORRECT.

CHAIR.

AND I THINK WHERE, UM, SO THE REQUIREMENT THAT IT BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN IS A REQUIREMENT OF STATE LAW.

AND IN MY EXPERIENCE, IT'S MOSTLY, UM, DONE WHERE YOU HAVE CITIES WHERE THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT AND CITY IS FORMED SINCE PROPOSING A NEW ROAD THROUGH AN UNDEVELOPED AREA AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION NEEDS TO DETERMINE THAT THAT NEW ROADS FOR THE UNDEVELOPED AREA IS CONSISTENT WITH WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS HEADING IN THE CITY.